This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Stearns v. Wallace
June 1, 1879 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1879 | Stearns v. Wallace Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
[Hillsborough,
June, 1879.]
Stearns v. Wallace.
W. W. Bailey, for the plaintiff.
Wadleigh Wallace, for the defendant.
No briefs furnished.
Doe, C. J.
There is nothing in the case to take it out of the general rule that an infant is responsible for his torts. Fitts v. Hall, 9 N. H. 441; School District v. Bragdon, 23 N. H. 507, 516; Beckley v. Newcomb, 24 N. H. 359; Woodman v. Hubbard, 25 N. H. 67, 73; Prescott v. Norris, 32 N. H. 101; Eaton v. Hill, 50 N. H. 235; Cooley Torts 103.
Exception overruled.
Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.