This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Elsher v. Hughes
June 1, 1881 - Opinion
Elsher v. Hughes.
The form of action may be changed by amendment, and the amendment may be made after a verdict for the plaintiff, without a new trial, when the verdict could not have been affected by the amendment if it had been made before the trial.
Trespass, qu. el. Verdict for the plaintiff.
Dodge and Copeland, for the defendant.
T. J. Smith and Worcester, for the plaintiff.
Doe, C. J.
The plaintiff is entitled to damages for the defendant’s use and occupation of the plaintiff’s store. The measure of-damages given to the jury was the same as would have been given in assumpsit. Whether, upon the evidence in the case, the value of the occupation should be recovered in trespass or assumpsit, is.an unnecessary question. Merrill v. Perkins, 59 N. H. 343. When the plaintiff amends the declaration by adding a common count in assumpsit, there will be
Judgment on the verdict.
Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1881 | Elsher v. Hughes Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |