This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Gage et al. v. Porter et al.
June 1, 1888 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1888 | Gage et al. v. Porter et al. Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
[Hillsborough,
June, 1888.]
Gage & a. v. Porter & a.
Dep.T, on an injunction bond filed in a bill in equity brought by Porter against the plaintiffs for leave to redeem mortgaged lands. Porter obtained a decree giving her leave to redeem by paying to the plaintiffs the amount of the mortgage debt in thirty days. She did not redeem.
C. H. Burns, for the plaintiffs.
H. B. Atherton, for Porter. W. W. Bailey, for the other defendants.
Carpenter, J.
By the terms of the condition Porter was to pay to the plaintiffs the damages occasioned by the injunction “ in case the proceeding in which the injunction has been issued shall be determined against her.” The determination of the proceeding was in her favor. She obtained leave to redeem, which, so far as appears, was all she prayed for in her bill. There was no breach of the condition, and there must be
Judgment for the defendants.
Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.