This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Estes & Sons v. Insurance Company
June 1, 1893 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1893 | Estes & Sons v. Insurance Company Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
Estes & Sons v. Insurance Company.
Motion, for rehearing of ease reported, ante, p. 462. Plaintiffs moved for judgment on the ground that the defendants were not entitled to a jury trial.
Calvin Page, for the plaintiffs.
Streeter, Walker ¿> Chase, for the defendants.
Clark, J.
Upon the facts agreed, the plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment. It cannot be held, as matter of law, that Barker was the agent of the defendants, or that the defendants have waived or are estopped to insist upon the forfeiture clause in the policies.
Motion for judgment denied.