This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Lord v. Wentworth
December 1, 1895 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 1, 1895 | Lord v. Wentworth Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
Carroll,
Dec., 1895.
Lord v. Wentworth.
Josiah H. Hobbs, for the plaintiff.
John B. Nash, for the defendant.
Trespass, guare clausum. March 11,.1875, Nathaniel.Willey owned a large rectangular lot of land bounded westerly by the “old road” and southerly by the “ new road.” In the corner formed by the junction of the two roads was a nearly square tract of about four acres called the Webster homestead, bounded westerly twenty-five rods on the “ old road ” and southerly twenty-six rods on the “ new road.” On that day he conveyed to Mary Webster a tract of land bounded and described as follows: “ Commencing at the junction of the two roads, thence running northerly on the old road about eighteen rods to a large stone opposite to my barn; thence easterly, parallel with the fence between my pasture and the Webster homestead, to a point far enough east to contain eight acres between said fence and the new road; thence southerly to the new road; and thence westerly on the new road to the bound begun at; meaning to convey the former homestead of the late Horace Webster.” The plaintiff excepted to the ruling that the deed conveyed to Mary the eight-acre tract and not merely the Webster homestead, and the exception was overruled.
Chase, J., did not sit.