This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
State (ex Rel. Borthwick Et Al.) v. Harrington et al.
June 1, 1899 - Opinion
Hillsborough,
June, 1899.
State (ex rel. Borthwick & a.) v. Harrington & a.
.Petition, under P. S., c. 205, ss. 4, 5. This is the same case reported ante, p. 496. After that decision, the plaintiffs moved at the trial term for an injunction against all the defendants, but introduced no evidence except the record. The motion was granted as to the tenant, and an order made dismissing the bill as to the landlords, to which the plaintiffs excepted.
Martin & Howe, Matthews $• Sawyer, and Sherman H. Burroughs, for the plaintiffs.
David A. laggart, Elijah M. lopliff, John P. Bartlett, and Drury Hurd, for the defendants.
Wallace, J.
No question of law is presented by the case. It was a question for the trial term whether there was occasion for the injunction to issue or not.
Exceptions overruled.
Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1899 | State (ex Rel. Borthwick et al.) v. Harrington et al. Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |