This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
White v. Dearborn et al.
June 1, 1899 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1899 | White v. Dearborn et al. Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
Hillsborough,
June, 1899.
White v. Dearborn & a.
Bill on Exceptions, to an order of-the court denying the plaintiff’s motion for a continuance.
Henry B. Atherton and Bertis A. Pease, for the plaintiff.
Charles J. Hamblett, for the defendants.
Young, J.
No question of law is raised by the plaintiff’s bill-of exceptions. The motion for a continuance raised a question of fact, and all such questions are for the trial term. Clark v. Clough, 62 N. H. 693.
Exception overruled.
Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.