This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
New London v. Davis et al.
New London v. Davis et al., 73 N.H. 72 (1904).
People and Organizations
Parties
- New London Plaintiff, First Caption Party
- Davis Defendant, Second Caption Party
Supreme Court Justices
- Reuben E. Walker Authoring justice
- And Young Panel justice
- Chase And Bingham Panel justice
- Chase And Bingham, J.j., Concurred. Parsons, C. J., And Young, J., Were Of The Opinion That No Tribunal Except The Town Had Jurisdiction To Determine Whether The Condition In The Vote Of’ Discontinuance Had Been Performed, And Did Not Agree To The Conclusion That A Finding Of Performance By Some Other Tribunal, Together With The Conditional Action Of The Town, Was A Valid Discontinuance Of The Way. They Therefore Dissented From The Result, Although Concurring In The Other Positions Taken In The Opinion Panel justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 1, 1904 | New London v. Davis et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |