This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Mary Sweeney v. Thomas H. McQuaid
April 3, 1928 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 3, 1928 | Mary Sweeney v. Thomas H. McQuaid Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
Municipal Court of Manchester,)
April 3, 1928.)
Mary Sweeney v. Thomas H. McQuaid.
James A. Broderick, for the plaintiff.
John S. Hurley, for the defendant.
Per Curiam.
In the absence of brief or oral argument by the defendant, no reason is perceived why the court did not have jurisdiction of both the parties and the cause of action. P. L., c. 323, s. 18; Patten v. Patten, 79 N. H. 388; Dolber v. Young, 81 N. H. 157.
Judgment on the verdict.