This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Merle J. Pratt v. Hazel M. Magnuson et al.
June 4, 1935 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 4, 1935 | Merle J. Pratt v. Hazel M. Magnuson et al. Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
Hillsbori
June 4, 1935
Merle J. Pratt v. Hazel M. Magnuson & a.
Frederick J. Gaffney, for the plaintiff, furnished no brief.
Osgood & Osgood and 0. Neil Tolman, for the defendants, furnished no brief.
Per Curiam.
The defendants were entitled to the order granting the motion as matter of law. Farnum v. Company, 69 N. H. 231.
Exception overruled.