This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Salem v. Martha Sperber
February 2, 1937 - Opinion
Rockingham,)
Feb. 2, 1937.
Salem v. Martha Sperber.
Chester T. Woodbury (by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.
John Scammon and George R. Scammon (the latter orally), for the defendant.
Per Curiam.
The statute (P. L., c. 66, s. 25) requires the purchaser of real estate sold by a tax collector to give notice to mortgagees within thirty days from the sale, and the sale “shall be void as against any mortgagee to whom such notice” is not given. The requirement of notice within the time specified is a material condition “because the statute makes it so.” Derry Bank v. Griffin, 68 N. H. 183, 184. The principle that in all cases of sales of real estate for non-payment of taxes “every prerequisite to the exercise of the power must precede its exercise” (Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 569) extends to matters to be performed in order that a sale include a mortgage interest, and the statutory regulations are fixed and rigid.
Decree for defendant.
Page, J., was absent.
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2, 1937 | Salem v. Martha Sperber Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |