This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Stewart Harkinson, By His Father and Next Friend v. Manchester
April 4, 1939 - Opinion
Hillsborough,
April 4, 1939.
No. 3018.
Stewart Harkinson, by his father and next friend v. Manchester.
Doyle & Doyle (Mr. Paul J. Doyle orally), for the plaintiff.
William H. Craig and O’Connor & Saidel (Mr. D. Frederick O’Con-nor orally), for the defendant.
Per Curiam.
This case is governed by the rule stated in Piasecny v. Manchester, 82 N. H. 458. Whether contemporary expansions of the field of governmental activities demand a corresponding expansion of the scope of municipal liability for the manner of performing public duties, is a matter for legislative rather than judicial determination.
Exception overruled.
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 4, 1939 | Stewart Harkinson, By His Father and Next Friend v. Manchester Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |