This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Attorney-General (ex. Rel. George A. Wingate) v. Rodolphe Lemelin et al.
October 6, 1942 - Opinion
Hillsborough,
Oct. 6, 1942.
No. 3345
Attorney-General (ex. rel. George A. Wingate) v. Rodolphe Lemelin & a.
Devine & Tobin, by brief, for the relator.
Emile Lemelin, by brief, for the defendant Lemelin.
McLane, Davis & Carleton (Mr. Carleton orally), for the mayor.
Burque, J.
Although this is a case of an appointment instead of an election to office, the principle of law governing the case is the same as enunciated in Attorney General v. Hunter, ante, 206 and the result reached is the same.
Information granted.
All concurred.
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 6, 1942 | Attorney-General (ex. Rel. George A. Wingate) v. Rodolphe Lemelin et al. Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |