This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 275:4 · Definition of Terms
275:4 Definition of Terms. – I. The term "employer" as used in the preceding section shall mean and include an individual, a partnership, an association, a corporation, a legal representative, trustee, receiver, trustee in bankruptcy, and any common carrier by rail, motor, water, air or express company doing business in or operating within the state. A franchisor is only an employer if the franchisor agrees in writing to assume the role of employer or co-employer of the franchisee or the employee of the franchisee. I-a. For the purposes of this section, "franchisee" and "franchisor" have the same meanings as in section 436.1 of title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations. II. In this subdivision, "employee" means and includes every person who may be permitted, required, or directed by any employer, in consideration of direct or indirect gain or profit, to engage in any employment, but shall not include any person exempted from the definition of employee as stated in RSA 281-A:2, VI(b)(2), (3), or (4), or RSA 281-A:2, VII(b), or a person providing services as part of a residential placement for individuals with developmental, acquired, or emotional disabilities, or any person who meets all of the following criteria: (a) The person possesses or has applied for a federal employer identification number or social security number, or in the alternative, has agreed in writing to carry out the responsibilities imposed on employers under this chapter. (b) The person has control and discretion over the means and manner of performance of the work, in that the result of the work, rather than the means or manner by which the work is performed, is the primary element bargained for by the employer. (c) The person has control over the time when the work is performed, and the time of performance is not dictated by the employer. However, this shall not prohibit the employer from reaching an agreement with the person as to completion schedule, range of work hours, and maximum number of work hours to be provided by the person, and in the case of entertainment, the time such entertainment is to be presented. (d) The person hires and pays the person's assistants, if any, and to the extent such assistants are employees, supervises the details of the assistants' work. (e) The person holds himself or herself out to be in business for himself or herself or is registered with the state as a business and the person has continuing or recurring business liabilities or obligations. (f) The person is responsible for satisfactory completion of work and may be held contractually responsible for failure to complete the work. (g) The person is not required to work exclusively for the employer. Source. 1951, 125:2. 1999, 279:1. 2007, 362:2, eff. Jan. 1, 2008. 2012, 139:1, eff. Aug. 6, 2012. 2017, 255:1, eff. July 18, 2017.
Source note
Source. 1951, 125:2. 1999, 279:1. 2007, 362:2, eff. Jan. 1, 2008. 2012, 139:1, eff. Aug. 6, 2012. 2017, 255:1, eff. July 18, 2017.
Source history
- 1951, 125:2
- 1999, 279:1
- 2007, 362:2, eff. Jan. 1, 2008
- 2012, 139:1, eff. Aug. 6, 2012
- 2017, 255:1, eff. July 18, 2017
Related materials
Bills affecting or mentioning this RSA
- 2026 HB1043 amend
- 2026 HB1109 amend · 2027-01-01
- 2026 HB1123 amend
- 2026 HB1177 amend · 2027-01-01
- 2026 HB1245-FN reference
- 2026 HB1245-FN reference
- 2026 HB1663 amend
- 2026 HB1761-FN reference · 2027-01-01
- 2025 HB2 amend
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2019-0061, Appeal of Keith R. Mader 2000 Revocable Trust & a. Supreme Court opinion · June 5, 2020
- 2016-0258, International Business Machines Corp. v. Gary Joseph Khoury Supreme Court opinion · Dec. 21, 2017
- 2009-753, Robert P. Grimard v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections Supreme Court opinion · Oct. 27, 2010
- 2008-111, APPEAL OF DAN'S CITY AUTO BODY Supreme Court opinion · Oct. 31, 2008
- 2006-586, The Demers Agency v. Tami Childs Widney Supreme Court opinion · July 17, 2007
- 2006-224, ACAS ACQUISITION (PRECITECH) INC. v. STEPHEN C. HOBERT Supreme Court opinion · May 3, 2007
- 2005-126, SYNCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ELDON WOOD & a. Supreme Court opinion · March 16, 2007
- 2003-271, 2003-272, NEW ENGLAND HOMES, INC. v. R.J. GUARNACCIA IRREVOCABLE TRUST & a. Supreme Court opinion · April 16, 2004
- 2002-456, DONALD P. CHISHOLM, JR. v. ULTIMA NASHUA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION & a. Supreme Court opinion · Oct. 14, 2003
- 2002-436, WILLIAM MCNEIR RICHMOND v. ANDREW HUTCHINSON; ENVIRONMENTAL SHOWCASE, LTD. v. ANDREW HUTCHINSON Supreme Court opinion · Aug. 18, 2003
- 2001-489, LABOR READY NORTHEAST, INC. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Supreme Court opinion · May 23, 2002