This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 458-A:12 · Initial Child-Custody Jurisdiction
458-A:12 Initial Child-Custody Jurisdiction. –
Copy linkExcept as otherwise provided in RSA 458-A:15, a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child-custody determination only if:
Copy linkThis state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state.
Copy linkA court of another state does not have jurisdiction under subparagraph (a), or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum under RSA 458-A:18 or RSA 458-A:19, and:
Copy linkThe child and the child's parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this state other than mere physical presence; and
Copy linkSubstantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships.
Copy linkAll courts having jurisdiction under subparagraph (a) or (b) have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child under RSA 458-A:18 or RSA 458-A:19.
Copy linkNo court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in subparagraph (a), (b), or (c).
Copy linkParagraph I is the exclusive jurisdictional basis for making a child-custody determination by a court of this state.
Copy linkPhysical presence of, or personal jurisdiction over, a party or a child is not necessary or sufficient to make a child-custody determination. Source. 2009, 191:1, eff. Dec. 1, 2010.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 2009, 191:1, eff. Dec. 1, 2010.
Source history
- 2009, 191:1, eff. Dec. 1, 2010
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB1710
reference
Jurisdiction. I. A petition under this chapter may be filed only in a court that has jurisdiction to make a child-custody determination with respect to the child at issue under RSA 458-A. II. A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction under RSA 458-A:15 if the court finds a credible risk of abduction. 458-F:6 Contents of Petition. I. A petition under this chapter shall be verified a
-
2026 HB1710
reference
emancipation of the child; III. The child’s attaining 18 years of age; or IV. The time the order is modified, revoked, vacated, or superseded by a court with jurisdiction under RSA 458-A:12, 458-A:13, and 458-A:14. 458-F:11 Uniformity of Application and Construction. In applying and construing this chapter as a uniform act, the courts shall give due consideration to the need to promote uniformity of the
-
2026 HB1710-FN
reference
Jurisdiction. I. A petition under this chapter may be filed only in a court that has jurisdiction to make a child-custody determination with respect to the child at issue under RSA 458-A. II. A court of this state has temporary emergency jurisdiction under RSA 458-A:15 if the court finds a credible risk of abduction. 458-F:6 Contents of Petition. I. A petition under this chapter shall be verified a
-
2026 HB1710-FN
reference
emancipation of the child; III. The child’s attaining 18 years of age; or IV. The time the order is modified, revoked, vacated, or superseded by a court with jurisdiction under RSA 458-A:12, 458-A:13, and 458-A:14. 458-F:11 Uniformity of Application and Construction. In applying and construing this chapter as a uniform act, the courts shall give due consideration to the need to promote uniformity of the
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2018-0086, 2018-0153, 2018-0398, In the Matter of Crystal Ndyaija and Joshua Ndyaija Supreme Court opinion · March 11, 2020
- 2019-0126, In re Guardianship of K.B. Supreme Court opinion · October 25, 2019
- 2016-0683, In the Matter of Gregory Neal and Lauren DiGiulio Supreme Court opinion · March 30, 2018