(Modified May 16, 2016: see court order)

In Case No. 2015-0463, James Yager v. K. William Clauson & a., the court on May 16, 2016, issued the following order: Supreme Court Rule 22(2) provides that a party filing a motion for rehearing or reconsideration shall state with particularity the points of law or fact that he claims the court has overlooked or misapprehended.

We have reviewed the claims made in the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and conclude that no points of law or fact were overlooked or misapprehended in our decision. Accordingly, upon reconsideration, we affirm our April 19, 2016 decision and deny the relief requested in the motion.

The slip opinion dated April 19, 2016, is modified on page 7, third paragraph, lines 7-8 by replacing “the motion to dismiss then pending against the law firm” with “the law firm’s still pending motion to dismiss.” Relief requested in motion for reconsideration denied; slip opinion modified.

Dalianis, C.J, and Hicks, Conboy, and Lynn, JJ., concurred.

Eileen Fox, Clerk