This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Barron et al. v. Bartlett
Kendrick, Adm'R, v. Pierce, 63 N.H. 619 (1885).
DecisionAgainst the claimants’ objection, hearsay evidence of their declarations having been admitted on the question of the amount of the plaintiffs’ lien, a new trial of that question is granted.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Barron Plaintiff, First Caption Party
- Bartlett Defendant, Second Caption Party
- Eaton Plaintiff, First Caption Party
- Lehan Defendant, Second Caption Party
- Kendrick, Adm'r Plaintiff, First Caption Party
- Pierce Defendant, Second Caption Party
Supreme Court Justices
- Charles Doe Authoring justice
- Carpenter And Bingham, J J., Did Not Sit: The Others Concurred Panel justice
- Cabpenteb Authoring justice
- Smith Panel justice
- Smith, J., Did Not Sit; The Others Concurred Panel justice
- Isaac Newton Blodgett Panel justice
- Blodgett, J., Did Not Sit: The Others Concurred Panel justice
Case Records (3)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1885 | Barron et al. v. Bartlett | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
| June 1, 1885 | Eaton et al. v. Lehan | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
| June 1, 1885 | Kendrick, Adm'R, v. Pierce | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |