This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Kendrick, Adm'R v. Pierce
June 1, 1885 - Opinion
Case records
Open case page| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 1, 1885 | Kendrick, Adm'R, v. Pierce Current page | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |
[Cheshire,
June, 1885.]
Kendrick, Adm'r, v. Pierce.
Assumpsit, for money paid by a surety of tbe defendant. Judgment was ordered for tbe plaintiff, and a bill of exceptions was allowed.
E. M. Forbes and Batchelder Sf Faulkner, for the plaintiff.
H. W. Brigham and Haskins Sf Stoddard, for the defendant.
Doe, C. J.
It is not claimed by either party that the bill of exceptions raises any question of law.
Exceptions overruled.
Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.