This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 21:1 · Application
21:1 Application. – In the construction of all statutes the following rules shall be observed, unless such construction would be inconsistent with the manifest intent of the legislature or repugnant to the context of the same statute. Source. RS 1:30. CS 1:30. GS 1:1. GL 1:1. PS 2:1. PL 2:1. RL 7:1.
Source note
Source. RS 1:30. CS 1:30. GS 1:1. GL 1:1. PS 2:1. PL 2:1. RL 7:1.
Source history
- RS 1:30. CS 1:30. GS 1:1. GL 1:1. PS 2:1. PL 2:1. RL 7:1
Related materials
Bills affecting or mentioning this RSA
- 2026 HB1012 amend
- 2026 HB1211 amend · 2027-01-01
- 2026 HB1464-FN amend · 2027-01-01
- 2026 SB298-FN amend · 2027-01-01
- 2025 HB189 add
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2025 N.H. 50, State v. Cormiea Supreme Court opinion · Dec. 2, 2025
- 2021-0408, In re Guardianship of D.E. Supreme Court opinion · Nov. 16, 2023
- 2021-0248, Appeal of State of New Hampshire Supreme Court opinion · July 21, 2022
- 2019-0693, Caroline Casey & a. v. New Hampshire Secretary of State & a. Supreme Court opinion · May 20, 2020
- 2018-0404, In re J.W. Supreme Court opinion · July 3, 2019
- 2015-0650, The State of New Hampshire v. Drew Fuller Supreme Court opinion · June 14, 2016
- 2014-0185, Jillian Cohen Bergeron v. New York Community Bank Supreme Court opinion · July 24, 2015
- 2013-0620, Scott Anderson & a. v. Executive Director, New Hampshire Retirement System & a. Supreme Court opinion · Sept. 30, 2014
- 2012-632, State of New Hampshire v. Kurt Carpentino Supreme Court opinion · Jan. 14, 2014
- 2012-394, Steve Trefethen & a. v. Town of Derry Supreme Court opinion · April 12, 2013
- 2010-688, Thomas Ettinger & a. v. Town of Madison Planning Board Supreme Court opinion · Dec. 8, 2011
- 2010-707 Dana Chatman v. James Brady & a. Supreme Court opinion · Sept. 15, 2011